Menu
Category: Statutory interpretation
“We must give effect to the specific over the general”
April 18, 2021 No Comments
If you’re a litigator, you’ve probably invoked the specific-controls-the-general canon at one time or another. Whether you’ve prevailed with that argument is another question; it ...
Read More → In statutory construction, be careful assuming the greater includes the lesser
July 8, 2021 No Comments
The FDA has the undisputed power to ban a medical device entirely; but if it approves the device, it may not ban certain uses. That ...
Read More → Katsas v. Randolph on jurisdictional order of operations
October 1, 2021 No Comments
Not long ago, two D.C. Circuit decisions reminded us not to lean too hard on jurisdictional truisms (e.g., “jurisdiction can’t be waived”), which, though seemingly ...
Read More → Don’t lean too hard on jurisdictional truisms
September 6, 2021 No Comments
Two recent decisions of the D.C. Circuit provide reminders that even jurisdictional truisms are not absolute. Truism #1: If Congress says something is jurisdictional, it’s ...
Read More → The limits of the “Congress knows how to say” canon
March 4, 2022 No Comments
In cases involving statutory construction, someone often will say, “if Congress had wanted to say X it would have been easy enough to say X.” ...
Read More → D.C. Circuit throws shade on legislative history and Chevron
June 19, 2023 No Comments
Are you a litigator looking for a federal case that (a) rejects legislative history, or (b) frowns on applying Chevron deference in the face of ...
Read More → Major questions v. elephants in mouseholes
June 30, 2023 No Comments
Do you know the difference between the major-questions doctrine and the no-elephants-in-mouseholes principle? If you ever find yourself litigating against federal agencies, it’s a distinction ...
Read More →